Are ipRGCs involved in human color vision? Hints from physiology, psychophysics, and natural image statistics.

Human photoreceptors consist of cones, rods, and melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). First studied in circadian regulation and pupillary control, ipRGCs project to a variety of brain centers suggesting a broader involvement beyond non-visual functions. IpRGC responses are stable, long-lasting, and with a particular codification of photoreceptor signals. In comparison with the transient and adaptive nature of cone and rod signals, ipRGCs' signaling might provide an ecological advantage to different attributes of color vision. Previous studies have indicated melanopsin's influence on visual responses yet its contribution to color perception in humans remains debated. We summarized evidence and hypotheses (from physiology, psychophysics, and natural image statistics) about direct and indirect involvement of ipRGCs in human color vision, by first briefly assessing the current knowledge about the role of melanopsin and ipRGCs in vision and codification of spectral signals. We then approached the question about melanopsin activation eliciting a color percept, discussing studies using the silent substitution method. Finally, we explore various avenues through which ipRGCs might impact color perception indirectly, such as through involvement in peripheral color matching, post-receptoral pathways, color constancy, long-term chromatic adaptation, and chromatic induction. While there is consensus about the role of ipRGCs in brightness perception, confirming its direct contribution to human color perception requires further investigation. We proposed potential approaches for future research, emphasizing the need for empirical validation and methodological thoroughness to elucidate the exact role of ipRGCs in human color vision.

Melanopsin enhances image persistence.

Contributions of the inner retinal photopigment melanopsin to human visual perception are incompletely understood. Here, we use a four-primary display to produce stimuli differing in melanopsin versus cone contrast in psychophysical paradigms in eight subjects with normal color vision. We address two predictions from electrophysiological recordings of the melanopsin system in non-human mammals: melanopsin influences color and/or supports image persistence under visual fixation. We first construct chromatic contrast sensitivity contours for stimuli differing in melanopsin excitation presented as a central annulus (10°) or peripheral (22.5°) spot. We find that although including melanopsin contrast produces modest changes in the average chromatic coordinates in both eccentricities, this occurs equally at low (0.5 Hz) and higher (3.75 Hz) temporal frequencies, arguing that it reflects divergence in cone spectral sensitivity in our participants from that captured in standardized cone fundamentals rather than a melanopsin contribution to color. We continue to ask whether the established ability of melanopsin to sustain firing of visual neurons under extended light exposure has a visual correlate, using the optical illusion of Troxler fading in which blurred spots in periphery disappear during visual fixation. We find that introducing additional melanopsin contrast (+28% Michelson contrast) to either bright or dark spots increases fading latency by 35% ± 8.8% and 41% ± 13.6%, respectively. Our data argue that the primary contribution of melanopsin to perception under these conditions is not to provide a color percept but rather to enhance persistence of low spatial frequency patterns during visual fixation.

The spectral sensitivity of human circadian phase resetting and melatonin suppression to light changes dynamically with light duration.

Human circadian, neuroendocrine, and neurobehavioral responses to light are mediated primarily by melanopsin-containing intrinsically-photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) but they also receive input from visual photoreceptors. Relative photoreceptor contributions are irradiance- and duration-dependent but results for long-duration light exposures are limited. We constructed irradiance-response curves and action spectra for melatonin suppression and circadian resetting responses in participants exposed to 6.5-h monochromatic 420, 460, 480, 507, 555, or 620 nm light exposures initiated near the onset of nocturnal melatonin secretion. Melatonin suppression and phase resetting action spectra were best fit by a single-opsin template with lambdamax at 481 and 483 nm, respectively. Linear combinations of melanopsin (ipRGC), short-wavelength (S) cone, and combined long- and medium-wavelength (L+M) cone functions were also fit and compared. For melatonin suppression, lambdamax was 441 nm in the first quarter of the 6.5-h exposure with a second peak at 550 nm, suggesting strong initial S and L+M cone contribution. This contribution decayed over time; lambdamax was 485 nm in the final quarter of light exposure, consistent with a predominant melanopsin contribution. Similarly, for circadian resetting, lambdamax ranged from 445 nm (all three functions) to 487 nm (L+M-cone and melanopsin functions only), suggesting significant S-cone contribution, consistent with recent model findings that the first few minutes of a light exposure drive the majority of the phase resetting response. These findings suggest a possible initial strong cone contribution in driving melatonin suppression and phase resetting, followed by a dominant melanopsin contribution over longer duration light exposures.

Is melanopsin activation affecting large field color-matching functions?

Color theory is based on the exclusive activation of cones. However, since the discovery of melanopsin expressing cells in the human retina, evidence of its intrusion in brightness and color vision is increasing. We aimed to assess if differences between peripheral or large field and foveal color matches can be accounted for by melanopsin activation or rod intrusion. Photopic color matches by young observers showed that differences between extrafoveal and foveal results cannot be explained by rod intrusion. Furthermore, statistical analyses on existing color-matching functions suggest a role of melanopsin activation, particularly, in large field S fundamentals.

Circadian and visual photometry.

Photometry is the metrology of light-optical radiation seen by the human eye due to its action on retinal photoreceptors. Its origins are closely tied to the International Commission on Illumination (CIE), which remains responsible for photometry standards and the language of light used in science and technology. When in 1931 it had become possible to model the response to light of the human eye based on reliable spectroradiometry data, the CIE published standard formulae for predicting the luminance of a stimulus. These and related colorimetry formulae are still in use, having been internationally agreed and adopted. Both fields continue to be the subject of active research and increasing accuracy. CIE S 026:2018 represents another milestone for the metrology of light (CIE, 2018a). It is the first standard where light is considered for its ability to evoke circadian and neurophysiological responses, and includes the spectral sensitivity of melanopsin-a retinal photopigment discovered, and shown to be contributing to and influencing responses from human intrinsically-photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), only 20 years ago (Berson et al., 2002; Hattar et al., 2002; Provencio et al., 1998). These accessory visual functions also depend to some extent on inputs from the rods and three types of cones; until very recently, rods and cones (or "classical photoreceptors") were the only photoreceptors in visual models. If photometry standards are replaced with modern physiological data, consistent changes should be expected in the photometry of these accessory functions. This chapter outlines the current standards, their definitions and calculations, and how the main elements are related.

Machine learning for comprehensive prediction of high risk for Alzheimer's disease based on chromatic pupilloperimetry.

Currently there are no reliable biomarkers for early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) at the preclinical stage. This study assessed the pupil light reflex (PLR) for focal red and blue light stimuli in central and peripheral retina in 125 cognitively normal middle age subjects (45-71 years old) at high risk for AD due to a family history of the disease (FH+), and 61 age-similar subjects with no family history of AD (FH-) using Chromatic Pupilloperimetry coupled with Machine Learning (ML). All subjects had normal ophthalmic assessment, and normal retinal and optic nerve thickness by optical coherence tomography. No significant differences were observed between groups in cognitive function and volumetric brain MRI. Chromatic pupilloperimetry-based ML models were highly discriminative in differentiating subjects with and without AD family history, using transient PLR for focal red (primarily cone-mediated), and dim blue (primarily rod-mediated) light stimuli. Features associated with transient pupil response latency (PRL) achieved Area Under the Curve Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC-ROC) of 0.90 ± 0.051 (left-eye) and 0.87 ± 0.048 (right-eye). Parameters associated with the contraction arm of the rod and cone-mediated PLR were more discriminative compared to parameters associated with the relaxation arm and melanopsin-mediated PLR. Significantly shorter PRL for dim blue light was measured in the FH+ group in two test targets in the temporal visual field in right eye that had highest relative weight in the ML algorithm (mean ± standard error, SE 0.449 s ± 0.007 s vs. 0.478 s ± 0.010 s, p = 0.038). Taken together our study suggests that subtle focal changes in pupil contraction latency may be detected in subjects at high risk to develop AD, decades before the onset of AD clinical symptoms. The dendrites of melanopsin containing retinal ganglion cells may be affected very early at the preclinical stages of AD.

Retinal neural dysfunction in diabetes revealed with handheld chromatic pupillometry.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the ability of handheld chromatic pupillometry to reveal and localise retinal neural dysfunction in diabetic patients with and without diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 82 diabetics (DM) and 93 controls (60.4 ± 8.4 years, 44.1% males). DM patients included those without (n = 25, 64.7 ± 6.3 years, 44.0% males) and with DR (n = 57, 60.3 ± 8.5 years, 64.9% males). Changes in horizontal pupil radius in response to blue (469 nm) and red (640 nm) light stimuli were assessed monocularly, in clinics, using a custom-built handheld pupillometer. Pupillometric parameters (phasic constriction amplitudes [predominantly from the outer retina], maximal constriction amplitudes [from the inner and outer retina] and post-illumination pupillary responses [PIPRs; predominantly from the inner retina]) were extracted from baseline-adjusted pupillary light response traces and compared between controls, DM without DR, and DR. Net PIPR was defined as the difference between blue and red PIPRs. RESULTS: Phasic constriction amplitudes to blue and red lights were decreased in DR compared to controls (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). Maximal constriction amplitudes to blue and red lights were decreased in DR compared to DM without DR (p < 0.001; p = 0.02), and in DM without DR compared to controls (p < 0.001; p = 0.005). Net PIPR was decreased in both DR and DM without DR compared to controls (p = 0.02; p = 0.03), suggesting a wavelength-dependent (and hence retinal) pupillometric dysfunction in diabetic patients with or without DR. CONCLUSIONS: Handheld chromatic pupillometry can reveal retinal neural dysfunction in diabetes, even without DR. Patients with DM but no DR displayed primarily inner retinal dysfunction, while patients with DR showed both inner and outer retinal dysfunction.

Melanopsin modulates refractive development and myopia.

Myopia, or nearsightedness, is the most common form of refractive abnormality and is characterized by excessive ocular elongation in relation to ocular power. Retinal neurotransmitter signaling, including dopamine, is implicated in myopic ocular growth, but the visual pathways that initiate and sustain myopia remain unclear. Melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells (mRGCs), which detect light, are important for visual function, and have connections with retinal dopamine cells. Here, we investigated how mRGCs influence normal and myopic refractive development using two mutant mouse models: Opn4-/- mice that lack functional melanopsin photopigments and intrinsic mRGC responses but still receive other photoreceptor-mediated input to these cells; and Opn4DTA/DTA mice that lack intrinsic and photoreceptor-mediated mRGC responses due to mRGC cell death. In mice with intact vision or form-deprivation, we measured refractive error, ocular properties including axial length and corneal curvature, and the levels of retinal dopamine and its primary metabolite, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPAC). Myopia was measured as a myopic shift, or the difference in refractive error between the form-deprived and contralateral eyes. We found that Opn4-/- mice had altered normal refractive development compared to Opn4+/+ wildtype mice, starting ∼4D more myopic but developing ∼2D greater hyperopia by 16 weeks of age. Consistent with hyperopia at older ages, 16 week-old Opn4-/- mice also had shorter eyes compared to Opn4+/+ mice (3.34 vs 3.42 mm). Opn4DTA/DTA mice, however, were more hyperopic than both Opn4+/+ and Opn4-/- mice across development ending with even shorter axial lengths. Despite these differences, both Opn4-/- and Opn4DTA/DTA mice had ∼2D greater myopic shifts in response to form-deprivation compared to Opn4+/+ mice. Furthermore, when vision was intact, dopamine and DOPAC levels were similar between Opn4-/- and Opn4+/+ mice, but higher in Opn4DTA/DTA mice, which differed with age. However, form-deprivation reduced retinal dopamine and DOAPC by ∼20% in Opn4-/- compared to Opn4+/+ mice but did not affect retinal dopamine and DOPAC in Opn4DTA/DTA mice. Lastly, systemically treating Opn4-/- mice with the dopamine precursor L-DOPA reduced their form-deprivation myopia by half compared to non-treated mice. Collectively our findings show that disruption of retinal melanopsin signaling alters the rate and magnitude of normal refractive development, yields greater susceptibility to form-deprivation myopia, and changes dopamine signaling. Our results suggest that mRGCs participate in the eye's response to myopigenic stimuli, acting partly through dopaminergic mechanisms, and provide a potential therapeutic target underling myopia progression. We conclude that proper mRGC function is necessary for correct refractive development and protection from myopia progression.

Dim light in the evening causes coordinated realignment of circadian rhythms, sleep, and short-term memory.

Light provides the primary signal for entraining circadian rhythms to the day/night cycle. In addition to rods and cones, the retina contains a small population of photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (pRGCs) expressing the photopigment melanopsin (OPN4). Concerns have been raised that exposure to dim artificial lighting in the evening (DLE) may perturb circadian rhythms and sleep patterns, and OPN4 is presumed to mediate these effects. Here, we examine the effects of 4-h, 20-lux DLE on circadian physiology and behavior in mice and the role of OPN4 in these responses. We show that 2 wk of DLE induces a phase delay of ∼2 to 3 h in mice, comparable to that reported in humans. DLE-induced phase shifts are unaffected in Opn4-/- mice, indicating that rods and cones are capable of driving these responses in the absence of melanopsin. DLE delays molecular clock rhythms in the heart, liver, adrenal gland, and dorsal hippocampus. It also reverses short-term recognition memory performance, which is associated with changes in preceding sleep history. In addition, DLE modifies patterns of hypothalamic and cortical cFos signals, a molecular correlate of recent neuronal activity. Together, our data show that DLE causes coordinated realignment of circadian rhythms, sleep patterns, and short-term memory process in mice. These effects are particularly relevant as DLE conditions-due to artificial light exposure-are experienced by the majority of the populace on a daily basis.

Variations in photoreceptor throughput to mouse visual cortex and the unique effects on tuning.

Visual input to primary visual cortex (V1) depends on highly adaptive filtering in the retina. In turn, isolation of V1 computations requires experimental control of retinal adaptation to infer its spatio-temporal-chromatic output. Here, we measure the balance of input to mouse V1, in the anesthetized setup, from the three main photoreceptor opsins-M-opsin, S-opsin, and rhodopsin-as a function of two stimulus dimensions. The first dimension is the level of light adaptation within the mesopic range, which governs the balance of rod and cone inputs to cortex. The second stimulus dimension is retinotopic position, which governs the balance of S- and M-cone opsin input due to the opsin expression gradient in the retina. The fitted model predicts opsin input under arbitrary lighting environments, which provides a much-needed handle on in-vivo studies of the mouse visual system. We use it here to reveal that V1 is rod-mediated in common laboratory settings yet cone-mediated in natural daylight. Next, we compare functional properties of V1 under rod and cone-mediated inputs. The results show that cone-mediated V1 responds to 2.5-fold higher temporal frequencies than rod-mediated V1. Furthermore, cone-mediated V1 has smaller receptive fields, yet similar spatial frequency tuning. V1 responses in rod-deficient (Gnat1-/-) mice confirm that the effects are due to differences in photoreceptor opsin contribution.

Extensive cone-dependent spectral opponency within a discrete zone of the lateral geniculate nucleus supporting mouse color vision.

Color vision, originating with opponent processing of spectrally distinct photoreceptor signals, plays important roles in animal behavior.1-4 Surprisingly, however, comparatively little is understood about color processing in the brain, including in widely used laboratory mammals such as mice. The retinal gradient in S- and M-cone opsin (co-)expression has traditionally been considered an impediment to mouse color vision.5-8 However, recent data indicate that mice exhibit robust chromatic discrimination within the central-upper visual field.9 Retinal color opponency has been reported to emerge from superimposing inhibitory surround receptive fields on the cone opsin expression gradient, and by introducing opponent rod signals in retinal regions with sparse M-cone opsin expression.10-13 The relative importance of these proposed mechanisms in determining the properties of neurons at higher visual processing stages remains unknown. We address these questions using multielectrode recordings from the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) in mice with altered M-cone spectral sensitivity (Opn1mwR) and multispectral stimuli that allow selective modulation of signaling by individual opsin classes. Remarkably, we find many (∼25%) LGN cells are color opponent, that such cells are localized to a distinct medial LGN zone and that their properties cannot simply be explained by the proposed retinal opponent mechanisms. Opponent responses in LGN can be driven solely by cones, independent of cone-opsin expression gradients and rod input, with many cells exhibiting spatially congruent antagonistic receptive fields. Our data therefore suggest previously unidentified mechanisms may support extensive and sophisticated color processing in the mouse LGN.

TGFß2 Upregulates Tyrosinase Activity through Opsin-3 in Human Skin Melanocytes In Vitro.

Opsin-3 (OPN3) is a potential key regulator of human melanocyte melanogenesis. How OPN3-mediated regulation of melanocyte melanogenesis is triggered is largely unclear. TGFß can inhibit the growth of human melanocytes and reduce melanin synthesis in melanocytes. However, whether TGFß2 can modulate pigmentation in normal human primary melanocytes through OPN3 is entirely unknown. In this study, we constructed a coculture model with human epidermal melanocytes and keratinocytes. OPN3, tyrosinase (TYR), tyrosinase-related protein (TRP)-1, and TRP-2 expression and TYR activity were detected to be higher in cocultured cells than in monocultured cells. Moreover, elevated levels of TGFß2 were detected in the culture supernatant of melanocytes cocultured with keratinocytes. OPN3 inhibition in melanocytes decreased TYR, TRP-1, and TRP-2 expression and downregulated TYR activity. Our findings indicate that TGFß2 upregulates TYR activity and TRP-1 and TRP-2 expression in human melanocytes through OPN3 and downstream calcium-dependent G-protein coupled signaling pathways to induce melanogenesis. Interestingly, treatment with the TGFß2 receptor inhibitor LY2109761 (10 µM) did not inhibit TGFß2-induced melanocyte melanogenesis though OPN3. Collectively, our data suggest that TGFß2 upregulates TYR activity through OPN3 through a TGFß2 receptor-independent and calcium-dependent G-protein coupled signaling pathway.

Prolonged Melanopsin-based Photoresponses Depend in Part on RPE65 and Cellular Retinaldehyde-binding Protein (CRALBP).

PURPOSE: Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) contain the photopigment melanopsin and can signal light continuously for many hours. Melanopsin is excited when its chromophore 11-cis-retinal absorbs a photon and becomes all-trans-retinal, which must be reisomerized to 11-cis-retinal to regenerate photoexcitable melanopsin. Due to the great distance separating ipRGCs from the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) whose retinoid cycle produces 11-cis-retinal, ipRGCs had been assumed to regenerate all melanopsin molecules autonomously. Surprisingly, we previously found that pharmacologically inhibiting the retinoid cycle rendered melanopsin-based responses to prolonged illumination less sustained, suggesting that the RPE may supply retinoids to help ipRGCs regenerate melanopsin during extended photostimulation. However, the specificity of those drugs is unclear. Here, we reexamined the role of the retinoid cycle, and tested whether the RPE-to-ipRGC transport of retinoids utilizes cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP), present throughout the RPE and Müller glia. METHODS: To measure melanopsin-mediated photoresponses in isolation, all animals were 8- to 12-month-old rod/cone-degenerate mice. We genetically knocked out RPE-specific 65 kDa protein (RPE65), a critical enzyme in the retinoid cycle. We also knocked out the CRALBP gene rlbp1 mainly in Foxg1-expressing Müller cells. We obtained multielectrode-array recordings from ipRGCs in a novel RPE-attached mouse retina preparation, and imaged pupillary light reflexes in vivo. RESULTS: Melanopsin-based ipRGC responses to prolonged light became less tonic in both knockout lines, and pupillary light reflexes were also less sustained in RPE65-knockout than control mice. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that ipRGCs rely partly on the retinoid cycle to continuously regenerate melanopsin during prolonged photostimulation, and suggest that CRALBP in Müller glia likely transports 11-cis-retinal from the RPE to ipRGCs - this is the first proposed functional role for CRALBP in the inner retina.

Selective amplification of ipRGC signals accounts for interictal photophobia in migraine.

Second only to headache, photophobia is the most debilitating symptom reported by people with migraine. While the melanopsin-containing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) are thought to play a role, how cone and melanopsin signals are integrated in this pathway to produce visual discomfort is poorly understood. We studied 60 people: 20 without headache and 20 each with interictal photophobia from migraine with or without visual aura. Participants viewed pulses of spectral change that selectively targeted melanopsin, the cones, or both and rated the degree of visual discomfort produced by these stimuli while we recorded pupil responses. We examined the data within a model that describes how cone and melanopsin signals are weighted and combined at the level of the retina and how this combined signal is transformed into a rating of discomfort or pupil response. Our results indicate that people with migraine do not differ from headache-free controls in the manner in which melanopsin and cone signals are combined. Instead, people with migraine demonstrate an enhanced response to integrated ipRGC signals for discomfort. This effect of migraine is selective for ratings of visual discomfort, in that an enhancement of pupil responses was not seen in the migraine group, nor were group differences found in surveys of other behaviors putatively linked to ipRGC function (chronotype, seasonal sensitivity, presence of a photic sneeze reflex). By revealing a dissociation in the amplification of discomfort vs. pupil response, our findings suggest a postretinal alteration in processing of ipRGC signals for photophobia in migraine.

Can We See with Melanopsin?

A small fraction of mammalian retinal ganglion cells are directly photoreceptive thanks to their expression of the photopigment melanopsin. These intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) have well-established roles in a variety of reflex responses to changes in ambient light intensity, including circadian photoentrainment. In this article, we review the growing evidence, obtained primarily from laboratory mice and humans, that the ability to sense light via melanopsin is also an important component of perceptual and form vision. Melanopsin photoreception has low temporal resolution, making it fundamentally biased toward detecting changes in ambient light and coarse patterns rather than fine details. Nevertheless, melanopsin can indirectly impact high-acuity vision by driving aspects of light adaptation ranging from pupil constriction to changes in visual circuit performance. Melanopsin also contributes directly to perceptions of brightness, and recent data suggest that this influences the appearance not only of overall scene brightness, but also of low-frequency patterns.

ISCEV extended protocol for the S-cone ERG.

The International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) standard for full-field electroretinography (ERG) describes a minimum procedure for testing generalized retinal function but encourages more extensive testing. This extended protocol describes a method of assessing the function of the short-wavelength-sensitive cone (S-cone) retinal pathway, using a short-wavelength flash superimposed on a background that saturates the rods and adapts the L/M-cones to elicit a response, known as the S-cone ERG. Stimulus parameters such as the strength and luminance of the flash and background, respectively, and their spectral and temporal characteristics are specified. As a complement to the ISCEV standard, testing the S-cone ERG enables further characterization of light-adapted retinal function and may refine diagnosis of some retinal disorders. Typical applications are described including use in the diagnosis of rod monochromacy and S-cone monochromacy, identification and investigation of cone On-bipolar cell dysfunction and use of the technique to confirm the diagnosis of enhanced S-cone syndrome.

The melanopsin-directed white noise electroretinogram (wnERG).

The white noise electroretinogram (wnERG) provides a measure of the impulse response function under conditions of retinal equilibrium; it is yet to be determined how the electrical response generated by melanopsin ganglion cell photoreception is expressed in the impulse response. To this end, we recorded the human wnERG to continuous temporal white noise (TWN) stimuli that were melanopsin-directed (rod and cone silent) or cone-directed (rod and melanopsin silent). The impulse response of the electroretinogram was derived by cross-correlating the TWN stimulus with the wnERG response. We observed that the LMS-cone directed wnERG contained the expected N1 wave (24.1 ±â€¯2.4 ms; mean ±â€¯SEM) and P1 wave (49.7 ±â€¯1.8 ms). Melanopsin-directed stimuli produced a unique wnERG with a slower negative deflection (Nm) at 62.9 ±â€¯3.3 ms followed by a positive deflection (Pm) at 126.3 ±â€¯5.1 ms. Additional experiments indicated this melanopsin-directed wnERG response was not due to cone intrusion. The Nm and NmPm amplitudes increased with illuminance (32,000-80,000 Td; no rod intrusion) and melanopsin contrast (10-36% Michelson contrast). As there are known pathways connecting melanopsin cells to the outer retina, we then measured the wnERG to combined melanopsin and cone-directed stimuli to quantify melanopsin interactions with cone signalling. With the combined stimuli, the N1P1 amplitudes were suppressed by ~59%, which may be a result of a destructive interference between the positive (P1) and negative (Nm) waves generated by the cone and melanopsin pathways. We conclude that the human wnERG to melanopsin-directed stimuli may reflect the combined response of intra-retinal melanopsin pathways, independent of rod and cone photoreception.

Characterization of the melanopsin gene (Opn4x) of diurnal and nocturnal snakes.

BACKGROUND: A number of non-visual responses to light in vertebrates, such as circadian rhythm control and pupillary light reflex, are mediated by melanopsins, G-protein coupled membrane receptors, conjugated to a retinal chromophore. In non-mammalian vertebrates, melanopsin expression is variable within the retina and extra-ocular tissues. Two paralog melanopsin genes were classified in vertebrates, Opn4x and Opn4m. Snakes are highly diversified vertebrates with a wide range of daily activity patterns, which raises questions about differences in structure, function and expression pattern of their melanopsin genes. In this study, we analyzed the melanopsin genes expressed in the retinas of 18 snake species from three families (Viperidae, Elapidae, and Colubridae), and also investigated extra-retinal tissue expression. RESULTS: Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the amplified gene belongs to the Opn4x group, and no expression of the Opn4m was found. The same paralog is expressed in the iris, but no extra-ocular expression was detected. Molecular evolutionary analysis indicated that melanopsins are evolving primarily under strong purifying selection, although lower evolutionary constraint was detected in snake lineages (ω = 0.2), compared to non-snake Opn4x and Opn4m (ω = 0.1). Statistical analysis of selective constraint suggests that snake phylogenetic relationships have driven stronger effects on melanopsin evolution, than the species activity pattern. In situ hybridization revealed the presence of melanopsin within cells in the outer and inner nuclear layers, in the ganglion cell layer, and intense labeling in the optic nerve. CONCLUSIONS: The loss of the Opn4m gene and extra-ocular photosensitive tissues in snakes may be associated with a prolonged nocturnal/mesopic bottleneck in the early history of snake evolution. The presence of melanopsin-containing cells in all retinal nuclear layers indicates a globally photosensitive retina, and the expression in classic photoreceptor cells suggest a regionalized co-expression of melanopsin and visual opsins.

Rescue of M-cone Function in Aged Opn1mw-/- Mice, a Model for Late-Stage Blue Cone Monochromacy.

Purpose: Previously we showed that AAV5-mediated expression of either human M- or L-opsin promoted regrowth of cone outer segments and rescued M-cone function in the treated M-opsin knockout (Opn1mw-/-) dorsal retina. In this study, we determined cone viability and window of treatability in aged Opn1mw-/- mice. Methods: Cone viability was assessed with antibody against cone arrestin and peanut agglutinin (PNA) staining. The rate of cone degeneration in Opn1mw-/- mice was quantified by PNA staining. AAV5 vector expressing human L-opsin was injected subretinally into one eye of Opn1mw-/- mice at 1, 7, and 15 months old, while the contralateral eyes served as controls. M-cone-mediated retinal function was analyzed 2 and 13 months postinjection by full-field ERG. L-opsin transgene expression and cone outer segment structure were examined by immunohistochemistry. Results: We showed that dorsal M-opsin dominant cones exhibit outer segment degeneration at an early age in Opn1mw-/- mice, whereas ventral S-opsin dominant cones were normal. The remaining M-opsin dominant cones remained viable for at least 15 months, albeit having shortened or no outer segments. We also showed that AAV5-mediated expression of human L-opsin was still able to rescue function and outer segment structure in the remaining M-opsin dominant cones when treatment was initiated at 15 months of age. Conclusions: Our results showing that the remaining M-opsin dominant cones in aged Opn1mw-/- mice can still be rescued by gene therapy is helpful for establishing the window of treatability in future blue cone monochromacy clinical trials.

Thrombospondin-1 Mediates Axon Regeneration in Retinal Ganglion Cells.

Neuronal subtypes show diverse injury responses, but the molecular underpinnings remain elusive. Using transgenic mice that allow reliable visualization of axonal fate, we demonstrate that intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) are both resilient to cell death and highly regenerative. Using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), we show genes that are differentially expressed in ipRGCs and that associate with their survival and axon regeneration. Strikingly, thrombospondin-1 (Thbs1) ranked as the most differentially expressed gene, along with the well-documented injury-response genes Atf3 and Jun. THBS1 knockdown in RGCs eliminated axon regeneration. Conversely, RGC overexpression of THBS1 enhanced regeneration in both ipRGCs and non-ipRGCs, an effect that was dependent on syndecan-1, a known THBS1-binding protein. All structural domains of the THBS1 were not equally effective; the trimerization and C-terminal domains promoted regeneration, while the THBS type-1 repeats were dispensable. Our results identify cell-type-specific induction of Thbs1 as a novel gene conferring high regenerative capacity.